Log In | Register
Skip to main content
Topic: Urgent for Boondockers (Read 7 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Urgent for Boondockers
Yahoo Message Number: 148214
Hi all, the following was forwarded to me by a fellow SKP Boondocker BOF member. It's time sensitive. Please share it. Kyra Miller, SOB owner and Lazy Daze follower.

WESTERN SLOPE NO-FEE COALITION

August 24, 2014

THE FEE-FREE PRESS

DEAR PUBLIC LANDS SUPPORTER ,
 Action is urgently needed to stop a bill introduced in the House, and already rammed through Committee and ready for a floor vote.
HR 5204 would authorize the Forest Service and BLM to charge fees for all public lands, for any activity, by any person, any time.
Details follow. Please TAKE ACTION NOW! Kitty Benzar

STOP THIS BILL HOUSE BILL WOULD ALLOW FEES FOR ALL PUBLIC LAND ACCESS
 Just before the House adjourned for their August recess, HR 5204 The Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Modernization Act of 2014, was introduced by U S. Representative Rob Bishop (R-UT) and rammed through the House Resources Committee, without a hearing, by its Chairman, U.S. Representative Doc Hastings (R-WA).
 It's likely that Bishop and Hastings are planning to get HR 5204 attached as a rider to the FY2015 appropriations bill. Although HR 5204 has attracted no sponsor in the Senate so far, it's likely that if attached as an appropriations rider it will pass both chambers without scrutiny or public debate, and become the law of the land, because appropriations bills are considered "must pass" in order to avoid a government shutdown.
 HR 5204, if enacted, could destroy the concept of public lands as places where everyone has access and is welcome. Every place, every activity, every person, could be required to pay a fee - an additional tax on top of the taxes that already support public lands - for access, regardless whether they are highly developed like National Parks and Forest Service or BLM campgrounds, or completely undeveloped like Wilderness Areas.
 HR 5204 would allow the kind of fees that have not been controversial to continue, such as fees for developed campgrounds and National Park entrance fees. But in addition to those fees, it would allow general access fees for any federal recreational lands and waters. It would accomplish this by two types of fee: Day Use Fees and Permit Fees.
 The only meaningful requirement for a Day Use Fee would be that where you park there is a toilet of some kind (could be a porta-potty or a stinky outhouse) within 1/2 mile.
 The only meaningful requirement for a Permit Fee would be that where you park gives access to a "special area." Neither "special" nor "area" is defined. The land agencies would have complete discretion to claim that any place at all is a "special area."
 So where there is a toilet it could be called a Day Use Fee. Where there is not a toilet, it could be called a Permit Fee. The result is the same: there would not be anyplace where a fee is not allowed. And since the agencies would get to keep all the fee money directly, there would be not be anywhere that they wouldn't have a strong incentive to charge a fee.

Public lands? Forget that. Not any more. Not if this passes.
 There is other stuff in HR 5204 (like no more fee-free days, citizenship checks on annual pass holders, and overhead costs rising from 15% to 25%), but they only rearrange the deck chairs on the sinking ship of our public lands.
A detailed analysis of the major provisions is on our website at this link.
 Congress is on vacation until the week after Labor Day. When they return, the 2015 appropriations bills will be among the top items of business. If Bishop and Hastings succeed in getting HR 5204 attached to one of them, it's almost guaranteed to pass.

What can stop it? ONLY ONE THING: PUBLIC OUTRAGE-PUBLIC ACTION.
 If you care about our public lands being turned into commodities available only to those who can afford to pay fees for everything, then you must let YOUR Representative and YOUR Senators hear from you. Tell them that this major change in public policy cannot be allowed, particularly without any public hearing or debate.
 HR 5204 lacks any over-arching vision or framework of our public lands being spaces where we all are welcome and have access. Yet it's being supported by groups like the National Parks Conservation Association, The Wilderness Society, and America Outdoors, because it throws a bone here and there to their special interests. But for the general public, there is nothing redeeming in this bill, nor any way it could be amended into something acceptable. It represents a complete change in public lands policy, which would be accomplished without public hearings or debate.
 Tell your congressional delegation to OPPOSE HR 5204 and TO NOT ALLOW IT TO BE ATTACHED TO AN APPROPRIATIONS BILL!
 All the contact information you need can be found at www.house.gov and www senate.gov.

Use their webform.
Call their office in Washington.
Call their local office.
Write, phone, fax, drop in in person.

Do all of the above. And then do it again!

Your personal action is urgently needed or this bill WILL PASS!

IF THAT HAPPENS, KISS YOUR ACCESS TO PUBLIC LANDS GOODBYE.
 The Western Slope No-Fee Coalition is a broad-based organization consisting of diverse interests including hiking, biking, boating, equestrian and motorized enthusiasts, community groups, local and state elected officials, conservatives and liberals, Republicans and Democrats, and just plain citizens.

Our goals are: To eliminate recreation fees for general access to public lands managed by the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management To eliminate backcountry fees and interpretive program fees in National Parks To require more accountability within the land management agencies To encourage Congress to adequately fund our public lands Thank you for your support!

Sincerely,

Kitty Benzar Western Slope No Fee Coalition | P.O. Box 135 | Durango | CO | 81302 WSNFC Website

Re: Urgent for Boondockers
Reply #1
Yahoo Message Number: 148239
Please explain to me why those of us who USE public facilities should not pay a reasonable fee to help maintain and protect those same facilities?
 Conversely, why should the general public share in paying the costs involved in my use of a facility?

Bob Siegel Santa Fe New Mexico

Re: Urgent for Boondockers
Reply #2
Yahoo Message Number: 148242
Bob, there are better places to discuss public policy and politics than this group. Those of us who feel that public lands are already funded by taxes can contact our representatives; those who disagree can let the bill pass. Let's get back to talking about Lazy Dazes. :-)

Andy Baird

Travels with Andy
Andy Baird
2021 Ford Ranger towing 2019 Airstream 19CB
Previously: 1985 LD Twin/King "Gertie"; 2003 LD Midbath "Skylark"

Re: Urgent for Boondockers
Reply #3
Yahoo Message Number: 148248
I agree.  My tiny little post pales in comparison with the lengthy sales pitch for "free stuff from the guvmint" but I shall assume your prudent admonition option also applies to the thread's originator.    ;-))