Log In | Register
Skip to main content
Topic: Mobile Connectivity (Read 259 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

 
Re: Mobile Connectivity
Reply #1
They, Technomadia, have built a good business model on on the road internet connectivity.   I tip my hat to them.   But without going deep into the weeds I disagree with many points in the evaluations.  In my opinion they have not kept up with the cell phone plans and technology.  And sadly national politics are playing a very large role outside the technology.   There are many new players in the field.  While it is a good read it is not the final answer.

If I may ----    Buy the cell phone separate from the cell plan.    Buy a good cell phone (read expensive).  Many times folks blame the carrier for issues that are cell phone problems.   You get better coverage with a premium cell phone.   Not all cell phones can receive all cell frequencies.   All cell phones are throw away tech.   They are only good for two many three years. 


personal fine art photo stuff
TF Mack | Flickr
It's all good .......
2014 Twin King

Re: Mobile Connectivity
Reply #2
"All cell phones are throw away tech."

As you disagree with others, I disagree with you on this point. I bought my 2nd cell, LG V-10, over six years ago and today I have no fault to find with it. One thing that did surprise me was when I took it back to the very same store where I'd purchased it in order to replace the battery, I was told; "Oh, we no longer sell the batteries, you'll have to go to a specialty shop for that."   ::)
Steve S.
Lazy Bones & Cedar
2004 30'IB (Island Bed)
Yesterday is History, Tomorrow is a Mystery
Live for the day!

Re: Mobile Connectivity
Reply #3
I think perhaps the question of whether a cell phone is "throw away tech" depends on how you use it. If you think of your phone as a telephone with a few added features, then almost anything sold in the last six or eight years will meet your needs. If you think of it as a pocket computer and/or as your most-used camera, then the incentive to upgrade to the latest and best every couple of years is much greater.

For example, when Apple introduced the ability to blur the background of a photo ("Portrait Mode") a few years ago, that was a major improvement in functionality and a good reason for me to upgrade, since like many people, I take most of my photos with my phone nowadays.

That said, I have never actually thrown away a cell phone, any more than I have thrown away a Macintosh computer. They keep on working seemingly forever, so they have ended up in the hands of friends, or in a few cases resold. If you don't know anybody who needs your old phone, you can donate it to a shelter for abuse victims. I've done that a couple of times in the past.
Andy Baird
2021 Ford Ranger towing 2019 Airstream 19CB
Previously: 1985 LD Twin/King "Gertie"; 2003 LD Midbath "Skylark"

Re: Mobile Connectivity
Reply #4
<smile>
What I mean is cell phone technology changes on a yearly basis.    What I mean by that is there is upgrades in both the sending and receiving technology in the cell phone ecosystem.    Yes older cell phones work but the user has no idea what the built in short comings from the standpoint of the new tech in the system.    Older cell phones are not anywhere as powerful as the newer version.  I'm not talking about the whiz band apps, I'm talking about the send and receive capabilities.  
As the major cell providers improve their system cell phone manufacturers added more bulletproof internal systems.    A five year cell phone can not and does not have the newer cell frequencies that have been added to the national cell system.  For example an my newer cell phone can receive and transmit in areas that older cells can not simply  because the guts  are not in the older cell phone. 
That was my major point about the Techno folks.   The look at only one side of the equation (only the transmit tech not the recieve tech) but there are two sides.  Either side can be at fault. 

I stand by my statement -- cell phones are throw away tech good for two years at max. 
personal fine art photo stuff
TF Mack | Flickr
It's all good .......
2014 Twin King

Re: Mobile Connectivity
Reply #5
Buy a good cell phone (read expensive).
It is possible to get not only good but very good cell phones for relatively little money. One example is the Nokia 6.1 which costs just $180 - a dual-SIM phone that gets its updates directly from Google (which means: fast updates).

The latest very positive review came out just today from Ars Technica: Best Android Phones (2019): Budget, Mid-Range, and the Latest Models | Ars... 

The main difference to expensive phones is in my opinion mainly the camera. However, you should keep in mind that a "mediocre" camera in a rather inexpensive but well reviewed phone (like i. e. the Nokia 6.1) is most of the time as good as the best cameras in $800+ phones were just two or three years ago.

One consideration is, of course, the screen size. The bigger your requirements are in regards to screen size the more money you have to spend on a good cell phone. I am still fine with the 4" screen of my iPhone SE and actually prefer that size over bigger phones.

Klaus
2001 26.5 Mid-Bath