Log In | Register
Skip to main content
Topic: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I'M GOING FOR IT! (Read 731 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I'M GOING FOR IT!
Just wondering if anyone seriously considered, plan to install or have installed the CLASS suspension system from LiquidSpring.

It's expensive but if you plan on keeping your coach it may be just the ticket.  I see that Phoenix Cruiser is offering it as an option on new coaches. 

CLASS Suspension System from LiquidSpring

2011 31' TB

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #1
Yes, I saw that was available on PC. I would not consider having one placed on my chassis.  Aside from  a lot of extra cost, it seems to be a lot of additional weight and maintenance concerns to fix something that isn't broke to begin with.  I have never noticed an inordinately rough ride on my new E450, or on my old one.  These are probably more useful in the bigger Class A coaches.
2017 RB

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #2
"I would not consider having one placed on my chassis.  Aside from  a lot of extra cost, it seems to be a lot of additional weight and maintenance concerns to fix something that isn't broke to begin with.  I have never noticed an inordinately rough ride on my new E450, or on my old one."
---
X2. I do have suspension and stable handling improvement add-ons, but my 2003 rides very well - for a truck;)
2003 TK has a new home

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #3
I've learned that with proper weight distribution and tire inflation, a front-end alignment with increased caster, front/rear sway-bars and steering damper in good condition that our Rig is well behaved in most conditions.  When we've encountered 30-40 mph side winds, then it's a difficult drive, which means it's time to seek a port in that storm. 

If the OP decides to add this system to their LD, then I'd be grateful for their review.

 
Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #4
            "... it may be just the ticket."

Why?    ::)
Steve S.
Lazy Bones & Cedar
2004 30'IB (Island Bed)
Yesterday is History, Tomorrow is a Mystery
Live for the day!

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #5
I see more weight, more parts to break, more whiz bang things to twiddle  with and screw up a trip.
Rodney
1988 Mid Bath

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #6
 8) Our 1995 26.5 MB handles well,especially for its age,and mileage.(86k+) We've been on mountainous back-roads,plus interstate travel. IMHO,the Mother-Ship has done a fantastic job of COG,and suspension.
1995 MB Mrdronennut

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #7
I really like the way my 2002 MB drives and handles. It’s so much better then my old SOB on the E350 chassis. And we bought that one brand new. At 123000 miles the only thing I’m thinking is maybe it is time for some new shocks.
Lynn and Lori

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #8
At the Pomona RV show last year, they had display and my brother and I talked with their representative for a while.
This system is made  primarily for the shuttle van industry . If you had been in a E450 airport shuttle, you know the rear suspension can be harsh. A long ride in one will test your tail bone.

It does add a lot of weight and complexity to a suspension that already is well proven. It's kind pricey too.
If anyone would like me to test the system, have it shipped to my place.

Larry
Larry
2003 23.5' Front Lounge, since new.  Previously 1983 22' Front Lounge.
Tow vehicles  2020 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, 2001 Jeep Cherokee
Photo Collection: Lazy Daze

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #9
            "... it may be just the ticket."

Why?    ::)

You ask why ...  I have a 2011 31 TB with Steer Safe and rear sway bars.  It's not bad...but it ain't GOOD either.  Eighteen Wheelers going buy at 70+ mph and crappy roads all over the midwest makes me long for something a little more comfy.  Fatigue and the white knuckle thing at the end of each day gets old.  Takes some of the pleasure out of the experience.
2011 31' TB

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #10
I have a 2011 31 TB with Steer Safe and rear sway bars.  It's not bad...but it ain't GOOD either.  Eighteen Wheelers going buy at 70+ mph and crappy roads all over the midwest makes me long for something a little more comfy.  Fatigue and the white knuckle thing at the end of each day gets old.  Takes some of the pleasure out of the experience.

You might take a look at what Jayco has done with their Class C suspension to help mitigate some of the driving characteristics of a Ford E450.    2019 Greyhawk Prestige Class C Motorhomes JRide® Plus | Jayco, Inc.  At the least, this information might provide some alternatives for those thinking about this matter.

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #11
My 2016 MB handles reasonably well.   To add that much money, weight, and complexity to the equation does not pencil out.
plan B - 2023 Travato

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #12
My 2016 MB handles reasonably well.   To add that much money, weight, and complexity to the equation does not pencil out.

I understand what you are saying but does owning an RV "pencil out" period?  lol
2011 31' TB

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #13
I understand what you are saying but does owning an RV "pencil out" period?

I don’t know what pencil out means. But if it means a negative return on one’s RV money then that’s an undeniable fact.  Margee and I are probably among those who have overdosed on the care of our Lazy Daze.  At the end of the day it’s what we want to do with our money that we’ve saved for 50 years.  After a quick review of the OP's question, I'd have to say that so far no one has installed a LiquidSpring System.   Now if the OP buys and installs this device and if he enjoys it then I’d have to say “good job. “

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #14
Not for me, I live by the KISS rule.
Discuss anything with anyone and disagree agreeably. Always be polite and respectful.

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone?
Reply #15
If nccampguy goes for it,  I hope he reports back on the experience.
As for things that 'pencil out',  the bumper sticker reading "We are spending our children's inheritance" is supposed to have a good solid ROI
Joel & Terry Wiley
dog Zeke
2013  31 IB   Orwan   / 2011 CRV Tow'd LWEROVE

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I AM GOING FOR IT!!
Reply #16
Well folks, We've decided to bite the bullet and have the LiquidSpring suspension system installed on our 2011 31TB.  It can't happen until the the 3rd week in October.  They swear I won't believe how good it will ride and handle after.  I guess we shall see.   I will post a detailed review of the system after the install.  Looks like we will be the first LD they have installed it on.  
2011 31' TB

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I AM GOING FOR IT!!
Reply #17
Well folks, We've decided to bite the bullet and have the LiquidSpring suspension system installed on our 2011 31TB.

 Curious.
How much does this system weigh vs how much excess CCC do you have on your 31’ LD with Big Foot levelers ?
Had it weighed ‘trip ready’ recently?



Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I'M GOING FOR IT!
Reply #18
Well folks, We've decided to bite the bullet and have the LiquidSpring suspension system installed on our 2011 31TB.  It can't happen until the the 3rd week in October.  They swear I won't believe how good it will ride and handle after.  I guess we shall see.  I will post a detailed review of the system after the install.  Looks like we will be the first LD they have installed it on. 

I would love to take a ride in it after the installation. Good thing you have a 31' model, there are a lot of components that need to be mounted.
The two accumulator tanks and the hydraulic power pack are not small, no way would all of this fit under our 23.5' FL, too many things like propane and holding tanks, as well as the generator, in the way.
Make sure they provide you with the installation and shop manuals, it would be good thing to have firm grasp on how everything operates and what to do if some part of it fails, there are a lot electronics and hydraulics involved.
If you can, weight it before and after.

As mentioned before, this suspension system was design primarily for shuttle vans, to tame the brutal beating the rear passengers take in a stock E450. 
We never sit in the rear seat of a E450 shuttle.
It should ease the and quiet the ride considerably. Now, what can be done about the front suspension's limited travel?
The driver and passenger sit on top of the front wheels and are most effected by front wheels actions .

Larry
Larry
2003 23.5' Front Lounge, since new.  Previously 1983 22' Front Lounge.
Tow vehicles  2020 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, 2001 Jeep Cherokee
Photo Collection: Lazy Daze

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I'M GOING FOR IT!
Reply #19
Well, I hope you don't mind me playing Devil's advocate and trying to point out why you should not install the LiquidSpring CLASS system. Of course, I have no dog in the fight so I can be entirely objective. I hope you take no offense - I am just offering my thoughts and would certainly be interested in hearing yours also :)

My initial thoughts is that this very expensive system is a solution in search of a problem. In some applications it may be more valuable than others and the reason I state that is because this upgrade is to the rear suspension only. For an RV the passengers should be seated over the front axle while driving and not the rear. For another application such as a Shuttle Bus where passengers will be seated directly over the rear axle they would receive the maximum benefit from any improvements to the rear axle.

Yes, a five-link suspension system (e.g. LiquidSpring CLASS) is an improvement when compared to a conventional leaf spring system but what exactly are those improvements? In short, you have the ability to tune the suspension to a great degree while leaf springs limit you severely. Range of motion is another area where a five-link trumps leafs. But are these an advantage for our purpose? I do not believe so. RVs do not find themselves on race courses on or off road. Even while on road in normal driving I am guessing most RV owners are very conservative drivers and show respect for the fact that their vehicles are far different from most others.

Now on to the spring and shock absorber combination. At first I though they may be making use of an interesting fluid I worked with two plus decades ago while working in the Lord Corporation High Energy Laboratory. That fluid was Magneto-Rheological (MR) fluid and was very cool stuff. You can read more about it here if you wish. From what I have gathered they are in fact using a compressible silicone fluid which is nothing special. Personally, I enjoy having the spring and shock absorber as independent components within a system. One may fail while the other is still able to work. Since the CLASS systems is placing all of their eggs in one basket - if one fails so does the other. :(

Now let's discuss the probability of failure. Leaf springs and shock absorbers are a very mature technology and there is a low probability of failure. If there is a problem you can most likely have it fixed anywhere. Now a five-link is a reasonably mature technology also but this one is highly customized - if you require replacement bushings or parts the only place you will find them is from the manufacturer. And when we discuss the most critical components of this system - the combination spring and shock absorber along with all of the associated sensors, 3,500 PSI system, computers and electromechanical components, etc. you are really increasing both the probability and severity of having a problem. When compared to leafs springs and shock absorbers this is one heck of a mess!

Installation is another issue. I took a look at the instructions there are some specialized tools and procedures required. A 600 ft-lb torque wrench is an $800-900 tool that you simply do not find in most garages. Then again, if you are torquing the main nuts and bolts which hold my control arms to the brackets and they call for 600 ft-lbs I expect that tool to be used. And how about a magnetic frame drill for drilling the holes that some of the mounting holes for the brackets? Those are $600-800 also and to be honest I have never seen one in an automotive shop. And if it were my choice I would prefer those holes to be drilled in the factory during assembly of the vehicle and not in a garage after. I'll vote for the million dollar FANUC robot drilling those critical holes in a controlled environment versus a magnetic frame drill that "looks good to me."

I could go on about the anti-squat advantage of a five-link while countering it with a discussion on the change in thrust angle as a result of the Panhard rod moving the axle laterally while the suspension compresses or extends. Of course the length of the Panhard rod relative to the suspension travel defines just how much lateral movement of the axle there is. In this case the rod is very short although the amount of suspension travel may be minimal also. Some things look real good on paper and even sound nice when talked about. But in real life they just do not return the expected value. Or worse yet, they transform a simple and very reliable system into something that unnecessarily complex and not nearly as reliable.

You are familiar with The Pareto principle? Sometimes called the 80/20 rule. In this case I strongly believe you could spend 20% of the cost of the CLASS and reward yourself with 80% of the improvement. The icing on the cake is that the system is just as reliable and remains simple and easy to maintain.

Maybe Koni FSDs in all four corners, upgraded front and rear anti-swar bars with appropriate bushings and possibly a HD steering damper up front and bolt-on track bar assembly for the rear? Again, you will be spending most of your time up front while underway so how beneficial will it be to upgrade only the rear?

Hope you enjoyed my thoughts and don't take any offense. I am just exercising my mind on a wild and crazy Friday night :)
Chet in Yorktown, Virginia

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I'M GOING FOR IT!
Reply #20
Well, I hope you don't mind me playing Devil's advocate and trying to point out why you should not install the LiquidSpring CLASS system. Of course, I have no dog in the fight so I can be entirely objective. I hope you take no offense - I am just offering my thoughts and would certainly be interested in hearing yours also :)

My initial thoughts is that this very expensive system is a solution in search of a problem. In some applications it may be more valuable than others and the reason I state that is because this upgrade is to the rear suspension only. For an RV the passengers should be seated over the front axle while driving and not the rear. For another application such as a Shuttle Bus where passengers will be seated directly over the rear axle they would receive the maximum benefit from any improvements to the rear axle.

Yes, a five-link suspension system (e.g. LiquidSpring CLASS) is an improvement when compared to a conventional leaf spring system but what exactly are those improvements? In short, you have the ability to tune the suspension to a great degree while leaf springs limit you severely. Range of motion is another area where a five-link trumps leafs. But are these an advantage for our purpose? I do not believe so. RVs do not find themselves on race courses on or off road. Even while on road in normal driving I am guessing most RV owners are very conservative drivers and show respect for the fact that their vehicles are far different from most others.

Now on to the spring and shock absorber combination. At first I though they may be making use of an interesting fluid I worked with two plus decades ago while working in the Lord Corporation High Energy Laboratory. That fluid was Magneto-Rheological (MR) fluid and was very cool stuff. You can read more about it here if you wish. From what I have gathered they are in fact using a compressible silicone fluid which is nothing special. Personally, I enjoy having the spring and shock absorber as independent components within a system. One may fail while the other is still able to work. Since the CLASS systems is placing all of their eggs in one basket - if one fails so does the other. :(

Now let's discuss the probability of failure. Leaf springs and shock absorbers are a very mature technology and there is a low probability of failure. If there is a problem you can most likely have it fixed anywhere. Now a five-link is a reasonably mature technology also but this one is highly customized - if you require replacement bushings or parts the only place you will find them is from the manufacturer. And when we discuss the most critical components of this system - the combination spring and shock absorber along with all of the associated sensors, 3,500 PSI system, computers and electromechanical components, etc. you are really increasing both the probability and severity of having a problem. When compared to leafs springs and shock absorbers this is one heck of a mess!

Installation is another issue. I took a look at the instructions there are some specialized tools and procedures required. A 600 ft-lb torque wrench is an $800-900 tool that you simply do not find in most garages. Then again, if you are torquing the main nuts and bolts which hold my control arms to the brackets and they call for 600 ft-lbs I expect that tool to be used. And how about a magnetic frame drill for drilling the holes that some of the mounting holes for the brackets? Those are $600-800 also and to be honest I have never seen one in an automotive shop. And if it were my choice I would prefer those holes to be drilled in the factory during assembly of the vehicle and not in a garage after. I'll vote for the million dollar FANUC robot drilling those critical holes in a controlled environment versus a magnetic frame drill that "looks good to me."

I could go on about the anti-squat advantage of a five-link while countering it with a discussion on the change in thrust angle as a result of the Panhard rod moving the axle laterally while the suspension compresses or extends. Of course the length of the Panhard rod relative to the suspension travel defines just how much lateral movement of the axle there is. In this case the rod is very short although the amount of suspension travel may be minimal also. Some things look real good on paper and even sound nice when talked about. But in real life they just do not return the expected value. Or worse yet, they transform a simple and very reliable system into something that unnecessarily complex and not nearly as reliable.

You are familiar with The Pareto principle? Sometimes called the 80/20 rule. In this case I strongly believe you could spend 20% of the cost of the CLASS and reward yourself with 80% of the improvement. The icing on the cake is that the system is just as reliable and remains simple and easy to maintain.

Maybe Koni FSDs in all four corners, upgraded front and rear anti-swar bars with appropriate bushings and possibly a HD steering damper up front and bolt-on track bar assembly for the rear? Again, you will be spending most of your time up front while underway so how beneficial will it be to upgrade only the rear?

Hope you enjoyed my thoughts and don't take any offense. I am just exercising my mind on a wild and crazy Friday night :)

Golly Gee Wiz Chet .... The primary industry this system is used is EMS.  It's done to make the folks in the back as well as the drivers as comfortable as possible.  But we shall see.  I'm good with an incremental improvement.  I look at it like I do the Big Foot Levelers I added last Fall.  Didn't need to do it.  Could have just continued the good ole leveling process.  But now I push a button and smile.  ;)

We were seriously considering other RV options that would improve the journey a bit.  Then you get into that trade-off thing.  I came to the conclusion that the only real soution would be a Newmar NewAire for about $400k.  But that ain't gonna happen.  So, this solution is cheap compared to changing rigs.

If I can feel a bit more comfy when the big rigs go flying by me and have a lighter grip on the wheel....its worth it to me.   :)   
2011 31' TB

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I'M GOING FOR IT!
Reply #21
I would love to take a ride in it after the installation. Good thing you have a 31' model, there are a lot of components that need to be mounted.
The two accumulator tanks and the hydraulic power pack are not small, no way would all of this fit under our 23.5' FL, too many things like propane and holding tanks, as well as the generator, in the way.
Make sure they provide you with the installation and shop manuals, it would be good thing to have firm grasp on how everything operates and what to do if some part of it fails, there are a lot electronics and hydraulics involved.
If you can, weight it before and after.

As mentioned before, this suspension system was design primarily for shuttle vans, to tame the brutal beating the rear passengers take in a stock E450. 
We never sit in the rear seat of a E450 shuttle.
It should ease the and quiet the ride considerably. Now, what can be done about the front suspension's limited travel?
The driver and passenger sit on top of the front wheels and are most effected by front wheels actions .

Larry

Larry, as always you make good points.  I should check the before and after weight so that I can report that back to everyone.  I'm personally not too worried about it though.  We use the rig as a mobile hotel room with fairly short stays.  So, we carry a light load compared to many.

The sales/marketing fella at LiquidSpring is an ex roadmaster suspension engineer.  He knew all about the springs, stabilizers, , sway bars, air ride solutions, etc.  He SWEARS that this solution will better than I can imagine. (of course its his job to sell the thing and I go into this with my eyes wide open).  He said, "you will be driving along with one hand on the wheel."  He said the majority of the handling issues on a larger Class C has to do with the amount of weight over the rear axle and the amount of coach hanging out behind that axle.  A little turn of the wheel up front makes the back end move quite a bit as the coach pivots over the rear axle.  Supposedly, the suspension design controls this better than any sway bar solution can.

He asked that I spread the word in the LD community.  He knows that many LDers "appreciate" superior engineering and also tend to keep their rigs for a long time.  So, we are good potential customers.  I promised that I would spread the word for sure, good or bad.

Regarding maintenance.  I will definitely learn all that I can and make sure to have the manuals, etc.  He said the system is pretty much bullet proof and requires no real maintenance.  For example, the liquid in the system doesn't have to be replaced.

I asked about the front suspension.  They have a solution for the Ford F series.  In that application they only have to install their Strut .  He said since the E450 has the type of suspension it has,  a solution would require a major rework and has proven not to be cost effective at this point.  He went on to say that the E450 front suspension is actually pretty decent and that the real culprit is the rear.

Bottom line, since we only live once, I'm going to give it a shot
2011 31' TB

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I'M GOING FOR IT!
Reply #22
Curious.
How much does this system weigh vs how much excess CCC do you have on your 31’ LD with Big Foot levelers ?
Had it weighed ‘trip ready’ recently?




I didn't ask about the incremental system weight but I seem to remember reading that its around 385lbs?  We carry a light load but I guess it would be smart to check it.  I've read that the Big Foot system with central pump (versus pumps at each jack) weighs about 180lbs.
2011 31' TB

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I'M GOING FOR IT!
Reply #23
nccampguy,

Fascinating system-CLASS. My DDF (Dear Departed Father) was a Captain on the Los Angeles County Fire Department for 30 years. He’d be fascinated by this discussion. I know I am.

Chet and Larry know far more than I ever will about the logistics of RV et al suspension systems. The CLASS system is all new to me but it is definitely an interesting read. To see it in action I found this YouTube post done by the manufacturer. https://youtu.be/WtorYxnaPjc

https://youtu.be/DX2njnN2GcM

As budgets go, the CLASS system is beyond me. Besides, I’m very pleased with how my RB handles (without a strong cross wind). Where emergency vehicles and shuttle busses are concerned, there is an obvious advantage to this device.

Personally, I try to stick close to OEM where possible and make only incremental changes when necessary. That being said, I am very enthusiastic about others venture into the fray and always interested in new technology and potential upgrades.

Keep us posted.

Kent
2015 27' RB "MissB.Haven"

Re: LiquidSpring CLASS System anyone? UPDATE: I'M GOING FOR IT!
Reply #24
I think the system is interesting and I'd love to hear how things turn out. 

We sometimes travel with a very light load (1-2 people, no water, on short overnight trips) and we sometimes travel with a much larger load (4-5 people on a 4-8 week trip).  I can really feel the difference in how stiff the back of the RV is and we sometimes have people riding back there.  It can be bouncy behind the rear axle!

The reactions remind me of what you hear about active stabilizers on boats.  One camp thinks they are expensive, overly complex, completely unnecessary, and prone to break.  A silly excuse to put holes in the bottom of your boat.  The other camp acknowledges all of that but still loves them and would never buy another boat without them.
 
Rich
'03MB in NC
 
2003 MB